I guess we’d have to say the comment was fairly naïve, all things considered, but anyone of right mind would have to agree with the hope behind J.
.J. Henry’s sentiment. The AP account of the Finchem announcement with respect to a drug policy carried this comment from the former T.C.U. golfer:
“A lot of people have talked about that integrity and honesty of golf is what makes it so special," he said. "I'd like to think there's none of that going on out here, to be honest with you."
Do you think someone’s already tinkered?
Nick Price thought so. Heart medications, wasn’t it? The ability to slow adrenalin in the heat of the moment, which I think even Mr. Henry would concede could be a distinct advantage. Those golfers looking at putts for the third or fourth time? They’re not looking for anything. They know what the putt's going to do. They’re dancing, in the true boxing sense, buying time, just trying to control their breath, and their nerves.
Given the stakes, the sophistication of modern sports and advances in pharmacology, I’d have to assume that if there is a way, the will exists. Perhaps someone on the mini-tours, perhaps a coach, perhaps, hate to say it, but yes, perhaps a parent, has sought an illegal edge. What Henry didn’t add, which he might’ve of, is that by its very nature, golf is far too complex for a cure-all. One generic drug ain't going to do it. Touch, distance, clarity, creativity? Is there a drug with all these properties? I don’t think so.
Smokes seemed to work well for Mr. Cabrera, though didn’t they? But then, tobacco, I gather, is a very complex herb. -0-
